Methodology

From scattered signals
to a clearer incident.

ServiceIsDown brings public service-status information into one structured view. Our methodology is designed to keep the source visible, preserve the incident timeline and make uncertainty explicit.

The objective is not to replace official status pages. It is to make information from multiple services easier to discover, compare and understand.

01Collect

Find relevant public service-status signals.

02Normalize

Turn different source formats into a consistent structure.

03Connect

Associate updates with the right service and incident.

04Present

Show source, chronology, status and context together.

01

Source collection

Start with the source.

Incident intelligence is only useful when users can understand where the underlying information came from.

SignalWhat it contributesRole
Official status pages

Provider-published service health and incident information.

Primary
Incident updates

Changes in status, investigation, mitigation and resolution.

Timeline
Public service context

Service identity, category and relevant operational context.

Context
02

Normalization

Different sources. One incident structure.

Providers describe incidents in different ways. ServiceIsDown organizes those signals into a consistent model so users do not need to learn a new status format for every service.

SOURCE AInvestigating connectivity issues
SOURCE BElevated error rates
SOURCE CService degradation
SERVICEISDOWN Structured incident
Service
Identified
Status
Normalized
Timeline
Preserved
Source
Visible
03

Incident timeline

The sequence matters.

A current status is only one point in an incident. The timeline helps show how the situation developed and separates earlier information from what is known now.

01 · DETECTED A disruption becomes visible

A relevant public signal is associated with the affected service.

02 · UPDATED New information is added

Subsequent source updates extend the chronology rather than replacing it.

03 · RESOLVED The incident reaches an outcome

Resolution is shown while the previous incident history remains available.

04

Certainty & interpretation

Facts should look like facts. Uncertainty should look uncertain.

ServiceIsDown should not make incomplete information appear more certain than it is. Source information, structured status and additional context need to remain distinguishable.

Source Keep attribution visible

Users should be able to understand the origin of important incident information.

Certainty Avoid filling unknowns

Missing or developing information should remain visibly incomplete.

Interpretation Separate context from source claims

Additional structure should help understanding without rewriting the underlying source.

05

What the status means

A status is a summary, not the whole story.

ServiceIsDown uses status information to make incidents easier to scan, while the source and timeline provide the detail needed to understand the situation.

Ongoing disruption

Current information indicates an active service problem.

Monitoring / developing

The incident remains active while new information or recovery is being observed.

Resolved

The available incident information indicates that the disruption has ended.

Status labels summarize the incident view presented by ServiceIsDown. For operational decisions, users should also review the linked source information and the latest provider update.

06

Principles

The methodology is built around four simple rules.

01Source first

Keep the origin of incident information visible.

02Preserve chronology

Show how information changed over time.

03Structure, don’t obscure

Make fragmented information easier to understand without hiding its source.

04Be explicit about uncertainty

Do not turn incomplete information into false precision.

See it in practice

Methodology matters most when an incident is unfolding.

Explore current incidents and see how ServiceIsDown brings source information, updates and context into one view.

Explore incidents